Asked by Jalen Barnes on May 21, 2024
Verified
When Immanuel Kant said, "Ought implies can," he meant that without freedom there could be no morality.
Ought Implies Can
A philosophical principle suggesting that if someone ought to do something, then it must be possible for them to do it.
Morality
A system of beliefs, values, and principles concerning what is right and wrong, guiding individuals in making ethical decisions.
- Study the interplay between freedom of choice, the burden of responsibility, and moral conduct.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightMay 25, 2024
Final Answer :
True
Explanation :
Kant believed that in order for moral responsibility to exist, individuals must have the ability to choose their actions freely. Without freedom, individuals cannot be held accountable for their actions and there can be no basis for moral judgment. Therefore, "ought implies can" means that the moral obligation to do something can only exist if one has the freedom and ability to do it.
Learning Objectives
- Study the interplay between freedom of choice, the burden of responsibility, and moral conduct.
Related questions
Write a Fictional, Argumentative Dialogue Between Two or More Characters ...
Legal Acts Cannot Be Immoral
Which Statement Below Best Represents the Existential Concept of Freedom ...
Existential Counseling Requires Facing the Reality of Death,loneliness,and Responsibility for ...
To Have Chosen a Means That One Could Have Chosen ...