Asked by Nabeel Malik on Sep 30, 2024
When one party to a contract claims that the defendant's meddling with the other party's performance of the contract wrongly caused the plaintiff to lose the benefit of that performance,the plaintiff has a cause of action for:
A) interference with contractual relations.
B) injurious falsehood.
C) interference with prospective advantage.
D) misappropriation.
Interference with Contractual Relations
Interference with Contractual Relations involves intentionally causing a party to a contract to fail to fulfill their obligations, harming the contractual relationship.
Plaintiff
The party who initiates a lawsuit in civil court against a defendant to seek remedy or damages.
Benefit of Performance
The advantage or gain promised to one party in a contract upon the fulfillment or performance of the conditions specified by the agreement.
- Identify the differences between torts relevant to business practices and reputation like defamation, injurious falsehood, and intentional interference.
Learning Objectives
- Identify the differences between torts relevant to business practices and reputation like defamation, injurious falsehood, and intentional interference.
Related questions
In the Case in the Text,Lewis-Gale Medical Center,LLC V ...
Which of the Following Is True of an Injurious Falsehood ...
In a Lawsuit for Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations,the Existing ...
Which Tort Involves the Publication of False Statements That Disparage ...
Which of the Following Is Also Termed Slander of Title ...