Asked by Grace Rogero on May 10, 2024
Verified
Which of the following comparisons of the descriptions "unacceptable" and "weak" in the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric is correct?
A) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that fair-mindedly follow where evidence and reasons lead.
B) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that thoughtfully analyze and evaluate major alternative points of view.
C) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that fail to identify strong, relevant counterarguments.
D) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that do justify results but do not explain reasons.
Holistic Critical Thinking
A comprehensive approach to critical thinking that considers all factors, perspectives, and implications in the process of evaluation or decision-making.
Comparisons
The act of evaluating two or more entities by identifying similarities and differences between them.
- Differentiate between strong and weak critical thinking using the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric.
Verified Answer
SD
Sandy DiPietroMay 16, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Both "unacceptable" and "weak" are used to describe attempts at critical thinking that fail to identify strong, relevant counterarguments.
Learning Objectives
- Differentiate between strong and weak critical thinking using the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric.
Related questions
Which of the Following Tools Can Be Used to Evaluate ...
Explain the Steps to Be Followed While Using the Holistic ...
Why Is It Difficult to Apply the Holistic Critical Thinking ...
List the Similarities Between the Criteria of Both Strong and ...
Which of the Following Evaluative Descriptions Are Used by the ...