Asked by Juliette Grant on May 19, 2024

verifed

Verified

Which of the following is an accurate statement about exclusive dealing agreements?

A) The qualitative substantiality test for gauging the legality of exclusive dealing agreements has prompted much criticism.
B) Exclusive dealing agreements are unlawful even when they have minimal effect on competition or monopolization.
C) The preventive nature of the Clayton Act does not allow it to cover exclusive dealing agreements.
D) Historically,exclusive dealing agreements involving a "not insubstantial" amount of commerce have been declared illegal.

Exclusive Dealing Agreements

Contracts between sellers and buyers wherein the buyer agrees to purchase exclusively from the seller, restricting purchases from competitors.

Qualitative Substantiality Test

A criterion used to assess the significance of portions of a copyrighted work used under the fair use doctrine, focusing on the qualitative value rather than the quantity.

  • Acquire knowledge of the foundational aspects of the Robinson-Patman Act, particularly with regard to price discrimination.
verifed

Verified Answer

MC
Michaela ChengMay 22, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
Exclusive dealing agreements initially were treated in much the same way as tying agreements.Courts looked at the dollar amount of commerce involved and declared illegal those agreements involving a "not insubstantial" amount of commerce.