Asked by Aa'Kyra Rivers on Apr 29, 2024
Verified
Which of the following is liability without fault?
A) Contributory negligence.
B) Assumption of the risk.
C) Strict liability.
D) Modified comparative negligence.
E) Pure comparative negligence.
Strict Liability
A legal principle that holds an individual or entity responsible for their actions or products, without the need to prove negligence or fault.
Fault
Responsibility for wrongdoing, error, or negligence, often determining liability in legal contexts.
Comparative Negligence
A legal doctrine in tort law that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury.
- Absorb the core teachings and defensive approaches related to negligence and liability, including the facets of contributory negligence, modified comparative negligence, strict liability, and the assumption of risk.
Verified Answer
CS
Chloe SmithMay 04, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Strict liability is liability without fault.Today,the theory of strict liability is used most commonly when the plaintiff is claiming to have been injured by a product that was unreasonably dangerous.
Learning Objectives
- Absorb the core teachings and defensive approaches related to negligence and liability, including the facets of contributory negligence, modified comparative negligence, strict liability, and the assumption of risk.