Asked by Cieana Briscoe on Sep 28, 2024
Which of the following is not a consequence of bargaining centralization?
A) An increase in the number of issues brought to the bargaining table
B) Separation between the negotiators and their constituents (the people they represent)
C) Improved ability to tailor contracts to local conditions
D) Decreased level of whipsawing
Bargaining Centralization
The degree to which negotiations and decision-making in labor relations are conducted at a single, comprehensive level, often involving multiple employers and unions.
Whipsawing
A tactic used in collective bargaining where a union negotiates with multiple employers one at a time, using the gains from the first negotiation as leverage in the following ones.
Local Conditions
The specific circumstances, cultural, economic, and environmental factors that are unique to a particular area or community.
- Apprehend how bargaining configurations influence the proceedings of negotiations and their eventual outcomes.
Learning Objectives
- Apprehend how bargaining configurations influence the proceedings of negotiations and their eventual outcomes.
Related questions
When Determining the Right Bargaining Structure for a Given Set ...
The Main Reason for the Trend Toward Decentralization of Bargaining ...
The Bargaining Environment Is Defined As ...
The Union Would Have a Better Bargaining Position in the ...
The Firm Would Have a Better Bargaining Position in the ...