Which of the following is true regarding the court's opinion in Price Auto Sales, Inc. v. Sanders, the case in the text in which a debtor sued an auto company for injuries sustained during an attempt to repossess his automobile?

A) The court ruled that the debtor had no right to protest the repossession.
B) The court ruled that repossession was not completed and that a breach of the peace occurred in the process of the repossession.
C) The court ruled that, because repossession had been completed, there could be no breach of the peace as a matter of law.
D) The court ruled that a debtor's protest does not affect whether or not repossession is complete, and it is not relevant to whether or not a breach of the peace occurred
E) The court ruled that once repossession is complete, it is not relevant whether or not a breach of the peace occurred.

Question

Chandan Rupana · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : B, Explanation :  The court ruled that repossession was not completed and that a breach of the peace occurred in the process of the repossession. This indicates that the court found the manner in which the repossession was conducted to be problematic, focusing on the legality and conduct of the repossession process rather than the completion of the repossession itself.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions