Asked by DARIN FILMS on May 05, 2024
Verified
Which of the following would best explain a situation where the ratio of net income/total equity of a firm is higher than the industry average, while the ratio of net income/total assets is lower than the industry average?
A) The firm's net profit margin is higher than the industry average.
B) The firm's asset turnover is higher than the industry average.
C) The firm's equity multiplier must be lower than the industry average.
D) The firm's debt ratio is higher than the industry average.
E) None of the options are correct.
Total Equity
Represents the value left in a company after all liabilities have been subtracted from assets, essentially the net assets owned by shareholders.
Net Income
The total profit of a company after all expenses and taxes have been deducted from total revenue.
- Learn to interpret how leverage ratios indicate a firm's financial configuration and its risk exposure.
Verified Answer
MA
Muneeb AbbasMay 12, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
The firm having a higher net income/total equity ratio than the industry average while having a lower net income/total assets ratio suggests that the firm is using more debt in its capital structure. This is because the equity multiplier (total assets/total equity) is higher, indicating a higher proportion of assets financed by debt. This does not directly relate to the firm's net profit margin or asset turnover but rather to its financial leverage, which is why option D is correct.
Learning Objectives
- Learn to interpret how leverage ratios indicate a firm's financial configuration and its risk exposure.
Related questions
Companies E and P Each Reported the Same Earnings Per ...
Companies HD and LD Have the Same Tax Rate,sales,total Assets,and ...
Provided a Firm Does Not Use an Extreme Amount of ...
Mahoe Corporation Has Provided the Following Financial Data: Dividends ...
When a Firm Borrows Money,which Types of Leverage Is It ...