Asked by Santos Morido on Jul 16, 2024
Verified
While creative comparisons can be richly suggestive of new ideas, comparative inferences are notoriously inadequate to the task of serving as final proofs of those ideas.
Comparative Inferences
The process of drawing conclusions based on comparisons between different data points, cases, or situations.
Final Proofs
The last version of a document or publication, reviewed for errors or necessary corrections before printing or distributing.
- Differentiate between employing comparative reasoning to develop concepts and its constraints in substantiating those concepts.
Verified Answer
RE
Richard EkwenibeJul 21, 2024
Final Answer :
True
Explanation :
Comparative inferences can be a starting point for generating new ideas, but they do not provide conclusive evidence or proof. Further analysis and evidence are necessary to fully support and validate an idea.
Learning Objectives
- Differentiate between employing comparative reasoning to develop concepts and its constraints in substantiating those concepts.
Related questions
Which of the Following Primarily Depends Upon Comparative Reasoning ...
Describe the Productivity Criterion as It Is Applied to the ...
Although Powerfully Persuasive, Comparisons Are Risky ...
Is One Argument by Analogy Ever Stronger Than Another ...
Consider the Following Argument by Analogy A And B Have Property S A ...