Asked by Brianna Prater on May 27, 2024
Verified
Compare and contrast focus group research with interview research.
Focus Group Research
Involves gathering a small, diverse group of people to discuss and provide feedback on a specific topic or product, facilitating qualitative data collection.
Interview Research
A qualitative research method involving direct, structured or semi-structured conversations to gather insights or data.
- Compare and contrast focus groups and interviews as qualitative research methods.
Verified Answer
DA
Dilyar ArkinMay 30, 2024
Final Answer :
Focus groups usually involve small group sessions with approximately 6-12 consumer participants. The session is guided by a moderator who leads a group discussion involving a product, concept, or marketing message. Focus groups are often used when a new idea or product is being tested, or the researchers want to generate new ideas for what strategic direction to take next. As you might guess, one benefit of focus groups is that they tend to elicit more rich, detailed, and narrative feedback from consumers. One drawback, however, is that social influence can play a role, dampening the expression of consumers' true individual attitudes. (See Chapter 11 for a discussion of some of these effects.)
One other research technique is to utilize in-depth interviews. Like focus groups, interviews involve direct contact with the consumer. In contrast to focus groups, this approach involves a one-on-one interaction with an interviewer and respondent. Interviews allow the researcher to collect rich, in-depth data, but minimize any impacts of group factors influencing consumer responding. Interviews can be particularly useful if the topic is sensitive, embarrassing, or polarizing in some way. The downside of interviews is that the research process can take much longer and is much more expensive because each consumer is being asked questions one at a time.
One other research technique is to utilize in-depth interviews. Like focus groups, interviews involve direct contact with the consumer. In contrast to focus groups, this approach involves a one-on-one interaction with an interviewer and respondent. Interviews allow the researcher to collect rich, in-depth data, but minimize any impacts of group factors influencing consumer responding. Interviews can be particularly useful if the topic is sensitive, embarrassing, or polarizing in some way. The downside of interviews is that the research process can take much longer and is much more expensive because each consumer is being asked questions one at a time.
Learning Objectives
- Compare and contrast focus groups and interviews as qualitative research methods.
Related questions
During a Focus Group, the Researcher Does Not Have to ...
Which of the Following Is NOT an Interview Prompt ...
Identify and Discuss at Least Two Problems with the Focus ...
The Answers You Receive from a Person You're Interviewing Will ...
Explain Important Considerations to Keep in Mind When Deciding Whether ...