Asked by Haris Jamal on Sep 25, 2024
Verified
In Maryland v.King (2012) ,the Supreme Court
A) ruled that police are constitutionally prohibited from seizing and searching the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest.
B) ruled that police are allowed to seize and search the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest.
C) upheld a policy of DNA testing of arrestees without providing evidence of individualized suspicion.
D) ruled that law enforcement cannot attach a GPS device to a person's car and monitor his or her movements without a warrant.
DNA Testing
A scientific method used to identify individuals based on unique genetic markers, widely used in forensic science, paternity testing, and genetic disease screening.
Maryland
A state located in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States, known for its significant historical sites and diverse geography.
Individualized Suspicion
A legal principle that requires law enforcement to have specific evidence of crime relating to a particular individual before conducting a search or seizure.
- Analyze the judiciary's approach to balancing individual rights against governmental interests in cases involving digital privacy and searches.
Verified Answer
VC
Valentine Colin2 days ago
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
In Maryland v. King (2012), the Supreme Court upheld the policy of DNA testing of arrestees without providing evidence of individualized suspicion. The court ruled that the government's interest in identifying the individual outweighs the minimal intrusion that DNA testing presents. This decision has been controversial, as it raises concerns about the privacy rights of individuals and the potential for misuse of DNA information.
Learning Objectives
- Analyze the judiciary's approach to balancing individual rights against governmental interests in cases involving digital privacy and searches.