Asked by Sharon Huang on Jun 06, 2024
Verified
In Riley v.California (2014) ,the Supreme Court
A) ruled that police are constitutionally prohibited from seizing and searching the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest.
B) ruled that police are allowed to seize and search the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest.
C) upheld a policy of DNA testing of arrestees without providing evidence of individualized suspicion.
D) ruled that law enforcement cannot attach a GPS device to a person's car and monitor his or her movements without a warrant.
Digital Contents
Information or data that is produced and consumed in digital form, such as text, images, videos, and audio files.
Constitutionally Prohibited
Activities or actions that are explicitly forbidden by the text of a constitution.
- Examine how the judiciary evaluates the equilibrium between personal freedoms and state interests in digital privacy and search-related legal cases.
Verified Answer
YS
yarelis sanchezJun 09, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
In Riley v. California, the Supreme Court ruled that police are constitutionally prohibited from seizing and searching the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest without a warrant or specific exception, such as exigent circumstances.
Learning Objectives
- Examine how the judiciary evaluates the equilibrium between personal freedoms and state interests in digital privacy and search-related legal cases.