Asked by LaNeigh Jones on Jul 16, 2024
Verified
In which circumstance may a court find parol evidence admissible to further the court's understanding of an agreement?
A) When a court determines that there is significant disagreement regarding the complete and final version of the agreement.
B) When a court determines that a written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement.
C) When a court determines that there is disagreement between the parties' over performance of the agreement once performance has actually started.
D) When a court determines that the plaintiff failed to do sufficient research to determine if signing the agreement was advisable.
E) When a court determines that either party failed to do sufficient research to determine if signing the agreement was advisable.
Parol Evidence Rule
A legal principle that prevents parties from presenting extrinsic evidence to modify, vary, or contradict the terms of a written contract.
- Comprehend the real-world uses and limitations of the parol evidence rule.
Verified Answer
CH
Courtney HayesJul 19, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Parol evidence is admissible when a court determines that a written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement. This allows the court to consider external evidence to interpret or supplement the written document.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the real-world uses and limitations of the parol evidence rule.