Asked by Shelby Buckler on May 18, 2024
Verified
Which of the following arguments refutes Carr's claim that business strategy is analogous to poker strategy?
A) Because good poker playing often involves concealing information and bluffing or deception,these rules ought to apply to business transactions
B) If an executive refuses to bluff periodically he or she is probably ignoring opportunities permitted under the "rules" of business
C) Most games do not legitimize deception,and therefore business should not be analogous to a game that does legitimize deception
D) Bluffing,exaggeration and concealment are legitimate ways for corporations to maximize their self interest
E) None of the above arguments refute Carr's claim
Business Strategy
A plan of action or set of decisions aimed at achieving specific business objectives and gaining a competitive advantage.
Poker Strategy
An approach or set of tactics employed in the game of poker or metaphorically in negotiations, emphasizing bluffing, reading opponents, and strategic decision-making.
- Become aware of the challenges and moral ambiguities involved in applying personal and professional ethics during negotiations.
Verified Answer
GS
Gabbi SablanMay 19, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
This argument directly refutes Carr's analogy by pointing out that most games do not legitimize deception, which undermines the idea that poker strategy is applicable to business strategy.
Learning Objectives
- Become aware of the challenges and moral ambiguities involved in applying personal and professional ethics during negotiations.
Related questions
The More Complex an Individual's Moral Reasoning Capability,the More He ...
An Individual Who Confuses Private Ethics with Business Morality Does ...
The Concept of Personalistic Ethics States That the Rightness of ...
The Concept of ____________ Ethics States That the Rightness of ...
A Negotiator Who Judges a Tactic on the Basis of ...