Asked by Krista Panco on Sep 28, 2024
Verified
Who argues that it is reasonable to speak of a duty not to treat an impaired infant under certain conditions?
A) Liao
B) Engelhardt
C) Tooley
D) Robertson
Duty Not To Treat
The ethical and sometimes legal right of healthcare providers to refuse treatment in certain circumstances, often based on the principle of "conscientious objection."
Impaired Infant
An infant who has a significant physical, mental, or developmental condition that affects their day-to-day functioning and quality of life.
Reasonable
Pertaining to actions, decisions, or beliefs that are logical, rational, and based on good judgment according to prevailing norms or evidences.
- Analyze ethical arguments regarding the non-treatment of impaired infants under certain conditions.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Analyze ethical arguments regarding the non-treatment of impaired infants under certain conditions.
Related questions
Which Moral View Might Support the Position That the Costs ...
Which Moral View Would Deny That a Lack of Rational ...
Which Moral View Holds That Even the Most Impaired Newborn ...
Utilitarians Do Not Consider Killing Impaired Infants to Be Wrong ...
Ohn Robertson Believes That the High Personal and Societal Costs ...