Asked by Jordan Nelson on Sep 27, 2024
Which moral view might support the position that the costs of saving an impaired infant would outweigh the benefits of doing this, and so the infant should not be saved?
A) Kantian ethics
B) Ross's theory
C) Utilitarianism
D) Rawls's theory
Costs
The expenses or losses incurred in the pursuit of an activity or the production of goods or services.
Benefits
The positive outcomes, advantages, or gains received from a particular action or policy.
Impaired Infant
Refers to a newborn or young child who has significant physical, intellectual, or developmental abnormalities.
- Analyze and distinguish between various moral stances on the appropriate treatment of impaired newborns.
Learning Objectives
- Analyze and distinguish between various moral stances on the appropriate treatment of impaired newborns.
Related questions
Which Moral View Would Deny That a Lack of Rational ...
Which Moral View Holds That Even the Most Impaired Newborn ...
Utilitarians Do Not Consider Killing Impaired Infants to Be Wrong ...
Who Argues That It Is Reasonable to Speak of a ...
Ohn Robertson Believes That the High Personal and Societal Costs ...