Asked by Sydney Ramkissoon on Sep 27, 2024
Which moral view would deny that a lack of rational autonomy justifies depriving impaired infants of a chance to claim life, bodily integrity, and social affiliation?
A) Utilitarianism
B) Rawls's theory
C) Natural law
D) The capabilities approach
Rational Autonomy
The capability of individuals to make reasoned, self-governed choices free from external constraints or coercion.
Bodily Integrity
The inviolability of the physical body and the right to control one’s own body free of external interference.
Social Affiliation
The process of connecting or associating with others, forming social bonds and networks.
- Compare and contrast moral views on the ethical treatment of impaired infants.
Learning Objectives
- Compare and contrast moral views on the ethical treatment of impaired infants.
Related questions
Which Moral View Holds That Even the Most Impaired Newborn ...
Which Moral View Might Support the Position That the Costs ...
Utilitarians Do Not Consider Killing Impaired Infants to Be Wrong ...
Who Argues That It Is Reasonable to Speak of a ...
Ohn Robertson Believes That the High Personal and Societal Costs ...