Asked by Krista Panco on Sep 28, 2024

verifed

Verified

Who argues that it is reasonable to speak of a duty not to treat an impaired infant under certain conditions?

A) Liao
B) Engelhardt
C) Tooley
D) Robertson

Duty Not To Treat

The ethical and sometimes legal right of healthcare providers to refuse treatment in certain circumstances, often based on the principle of "conscientious objection."

Impaired Infant

An infant who has a significant physical, mental, or developmental condition that affects their day-to-day functioning and quality of life.

Reasonable

Pertaining to actions, decisions, or beliefs that are logical, rational, and based on good judgment according to prevailing norms or evidences.

  • Analyze ethical arguments regarding the non-treatment of impaired infants under certain conditions.
verifed

Verified Answer

BC
Brian Cornette1 day ago
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Engelhardt argues that it may be reasonable to speak of a duty not to treat an impaired infant under certain conditions, such as when treatment is futile or excessively burdensome, and when it is not in the best interest of the infant. Liao, Tooley, and Robertson do not explicitly argue for this position.